What makes patients aware of their artificial knee joint?

BACKGROUND: Joint awareness was recently introduced as a new concept for outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Findings from qualitative and psychometric studies suggest that joint awareness is a distinct concept especially relevant to patients with good surgical outcome and patients at late follow-up time points. The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of the concept of joint awareness by identifying situations in which patients are aware of their artificial knee joint and to investigate what bodily sensations and psychological factors raise a patient's awareness of her/his knee. In addition, we evaluated the relative importance of patient-reported outcome parameters that are commonly assessed in orthopaedics. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients being at least 12 months after TKA. The interviews focused on when, where and for what reasons patients were aware of their artificial knee joint. To evaluate the relative importance of 'joint awareness' after TKA among nine commonly assessed outcome parameters (e.g. pain or stiffness), we collected importance ratings ('0' indicating no importance at all and '10' indicating high importance). RESULTS: We conducted interviews with 40 TKA patients (mean age 69.0 years; 65.0% female). Joint awareness was found to be frequently triggered by kneeling on the floor (30%), climbing stairs (25%), and starting up after resting (25%). Patients reported joint awareness to be related to activities of daily living (68%), specific movements (60%), or meteoropathy (18%). Sensations causing joint awareness included pain (45%) or stiffness (15%). Psychological factors raising a patient's awareness of his/her knee comprised for example feelings of insecurity (15%), and fears related to revision surgeries, inflammations or recurring pain (8%). Patients' importance ratings of outcome parameters were generally high and did not allow differentiating clearly among them. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a wide range of situations, activities, movements and psychological factors contributing to patients' awareness of their artificial knee joints. This improves the understanding of the concept of joint awareness and of a patient's perception of his/her artificial knee joint. The diversity of sensations and factors raising patient's awareness of their joint encourages taking a broader perspective on outcome after TKA.

Cancer patients' understanding of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores presented as bar charts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cancer patients' understanding of graphical presentations of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with brain tumour patients participating in routine patient-reported outcome (PRO) monitoring. We assessed understanding of longitudinal quality of life (QOL) profiles, presented as bar charts objectively and with self-ratings. In addition, patients' opinions on congruency of the QOL scores with their self-perceived health status were evaluated. RESULTS: We recruited 40 brain tumour patients (57.5% female; mean age 52.7, SD 13.7). In total, 90% of patients rated the graphs as easy to understand. Accordingly, almost all questions on assessing understanding objectively were answered correctly by at least 80% of the patients. More than 95% indicated that the displayed QOL scores matched their personal perception of symptom burden and functional health in the observed period. CONCLUSION: Patients are able to understand their QOL results when presented graphically and are able to interpret important changes. Displayed QOL scores obtained with the EORTC QLQ-C30 are consistent with the patients' personal perception of physical and emotional functioning, pain and fatigue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge about patients' understanding of graphically displayed QOL results contributes to creation of optimal evidence-based feedback on the patients' present QOL and its trajectory.

[Acceptance of tinnitus: Validation of the ?Akzeptanzfragebogen bei chronischem Tinnitus' (AFCT)]. / Akzeptanz bei Tinnitus: Validierung des "Akzeptanzfragebogen bei chronischem Tinnitus" (AFCT).

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a widely spread symptom, which is perceived chronically by approximately 10% of the population. The vast majority of the tinnitus patients doesn´t feel impaired through the ear noise, but about 5-30% of the tinnitus patient are suffering in their everyday life. Whether severe distress is experienced cannot be explained by the quality of the ear noise itself (i. e. loudness or duration). Newer research tends to explain the difference in the experienced strain by the concept of acceptance. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric quality of a German Version of the "Chronic Pain Acceptance Ques-tionnaire" (CPAQ), namely the "Akzeptanzfragebogen bei chronischem Tinnitus" (AFCT) which has been adapted for tinnitus. METHODS: 97 patients with chronic tinnitus have been tested at the start of an outpatient tinnitus group therapy. The following questionnaires were used: "Akzeptanzfragebogen bei chronischem Tinnitus" (AFCT) and "Tinnitusfragebogen" (TF). The structure of the AFCT was determined by a factor analysis. The reliability was evaluated by the estimation of the internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha). RESULTS: Due to psychometric weakness and unclear factorial loadings 8 items have been removed. Out of the remaining 12 items the AFCT-12 has been developed. The AFCT-12 consists of 2 factors, which explain a variance of 54.9%. Both AFCT-12 and AFCT have a satisfactory reliability and validity. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the AFCT-12 is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the acceptance of patients suffering from chronic tinnitus.